ConclusionThis is a featured page

It is our job as Christians, as those who love the Lord, to obey his commands. Some of these commands are very blunt: 'do not committ adultery' comes to mind. Others of them are written with a broader brush, showing up in pattern and precept in various ways throughout Scripture. Each of these needs to be placed in their context; just as Jesus expands our knowledge of the meaning of adultery by including lustful thoughts.

Some of the things we see in Scripture are obvious 'good in themselves'; the laws against murder and theft come to mind. Others are principally symbolic (such as communion and baptism) and do not seem, as laws, to actually have physical effect. But there is no real hard and fast line of separation between these two uses. The laws against murder and theft are important symbolically in reflecting God's holiness and His creation of life and property. Baptism and communion increase our social feelings of community and bind us together.

So it is with the laws regarding marraige. The pattern and precept of marriage has been obscured greatly in recent years. The practical effect of this has been a breakdown in social restrictions. As at least a partial result, fornication, abortion and divorce are rampant.

And also as regards the church, the destruction of symbology has resulted in a destruction of the things symbolized. No longer do wives submit to their husbands as Lord; and large blocks of the church are similarly avoiding the Lordship of our husband. Just as we have obscured the forms of the process of marriage; so have we obscured the other forms of the church; replacing elders with democracy for example.


There are a myriad of websites etc. speaking of the parallelisms between our betrothal as the church and features of Jewish marriage. One particuarly interesting site is: http://www.biblestudymanuals.net/jewish_marriage_customs.htm

Just a glimpse into some of the parallels he draws:

...Earlier it was stated that in His promise in John 14 Jesus drew an analogy from Jewish marriage customs in biblical times. Now that the marriage customs have been considered, it is essential that the analogy be examined. In what ways was Jesus' promise analogous with Jewish marriage customs? In the examination of the analogy the first thing that should be noted is the fact that the Scriptures regard the Church to be the Bride of Christ (Eph. 5:22-23). In addition, just as the Jewish bridegroom took the initiative in marriage by leaving his father's house and travelling to the home of the prospective bride, so Jesus left His Father's house in heaven and travelled to earth, the home of His prospective Church, over 1900 years ago.
In the same manner as the Jewish bridegroom came to the bride's home for the purpose of obtaining her through the establishment of a marriage covenant, so Jesus came to earth for the purpose of obtaining the Church through the establishment of a covenant...
Our obedience to Christ should include our obedience to the forms that He instituted and affirmed. By following this pattern and precept we will be building His church in His way; in this particular case by building generation on generation in righteous obedience.

Thus we are proposing this document, and particularly the covenant. We are proposing that the patriarchs of this age gather together in covenant. That they seek, when need so requires, a bride for their sons. They seek this bride from among the family of the faithful: with whom they are in covenant. The fathers agreeing, a Betrothal is covenanted. The children can then commit their hearts to each other.




jcschuttger
jcschuttger
Latest page update: made by jcschuttger , Jan 11 2008, 3:01 PM EST (about this update About This Update jcschuttger Edited by jcschuttger

2 words added
2 words deleted

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page
There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.